THE IDOL OF GOD…
when humanity discovered its “ self ” it bore divinity and created god,
this was the birth of the war of heaven against hell the lucifer against the leviathan.
Some have called me a creature but a creator I am .. I am I says the creator I am ego I am giving but i give with preference I give selfishly .
when humanity created a golden calf called molech they offerd up there soul to the idol of god ( molech is the state, the king the pope, it is the “we” lifted above the dominion of the individual) the stealing one “I am worship me”. all gifts given without preferences are the trap of the great leviathan … it speaks ,, soft lies
a force that worships the Idol of god worships tyranny and in turn acts as tyrants.—
—the slave to the creator is no less a slave and breeds slaves…
who is the I am worship me but the great we , and the one who worships himself ? WHO BURNS THERE WINGS IN THE SUN and wanders the earth like a morning star.
the foundation of the idol of god is the worship of pistis as master Ie
( faith/ belief ) to view pistis as a door to dianoia as the absolute when it is dianoia that is the gate to the highest form of knowledge “wisdom” what i insinuate is this it is dianoia that is god and the gateway to wisdom, the good the subjective female goddess of nietzsche and sartre the golden one of anthem by rand i call her “sophia Ishtar” dianoia is promithian the god of insight that gives glory to wisdom.
the transition hear from the worship of the male and singular static state of dianoia as knowledge as “fact” to see dianoia not as evil but as what it is the door of insight , the door into noesis Ie wisdom the birth place of souls, the womb of barbelo.
AND AMENDMENT AND CONFESSION..
i would like to add here that i feel there may be another flaw in how i havwe presented this here, the four eliments of knowledge stand around a central hub, and that i would rather call this wisdom, the aplication of the eliments of knowledge as they stand in progression, furthermore “faith” “Pistis” or “trust” may infact have a place in the dynamics of human interactions and nature, it is rather as a confession of myself i have been burnt so many times so badly in this way throughout life my metaphysics diverged aswell, to sumate i say this faith should stand in the evidence of something tangible or not i feel reason is its natural partner or spouse, and no matter how badly i have ever been hurt in life i still trust the one i love, so too should humanity try to do the same and not act as crewel heartless solely logical impericists even the luciferic gnostics i find guilty of this sometime and it is a thing to be contested as freiderick nietzsche once said “not all that is inteligable is all that is good” this here i endorse and amend.
I WILL NOW CONTINUE TO THE STREAM OF MY PREVIOUS ARGURMENT..
what we call god is our virtue our sense of beauty and what is revired to be rare
once more I say it is something belonging to the individual and I suggest this not simply that the individual is his own god but that the individual is god
when a being awakens it dies to the dragon and becomes a creator it is this
sence of death that has been inherant to men and in the dragon men “live a long time sick”socates) but the I he who is set free who is emancipated, death is not his calling nor holds no berring over his life and he is fearlesss of it , socrates may have rightly confronted death as death is the gate to life but as life is change it is clear to me that he clearly missed it’s marrow to wich i refer, change- life is becoming. the static state univers proposed by the platonists and zeno as enlightened as they were as to the upper neumanon has laid the foundation of the idol of god that there is no plurality of the soul ie that there is now a metaphisical idol a lamp on a hill for all to stair to .
hear me now the fire has been caried down the mountian will you open the eyes of your soul and kindle your hearts “the god” lives within. climb your mountians and asend to the sun says the undiluted star.
to describe the idol of god i will depict two entity’s the i am worship i and the i am worship me. the one the I says independence it speaks strength it speaks health it is the bestower of such things that come from the self it speaks spirit truth and life , the other entity or so it has been called a god , a church and a state it is a cross to be crucifyed on it is a beast made of many beasts and its identity lies in the many, it is the leviathan and the leagion thats conquest is gounded in force formost it is the thief of all souls that says worship me,
it is the servant of eden who says worship your self.
nameless faceless imageless that is the god of the deaf and blind , the god of ignorance the idol of god as nietzsche put it the untouchable divinity that can never be known . it is becoming that is the virtuous and knowable god the ( it is the god of the sences the dyonician becoming of god that made nietzsche the advocate of the nihilistic as from this advocation that the infinate is irrational.)
da-sien of existance , the syntax between haeven and earth ( the thelktikos) it is the rock in the torent of spring.
what has been the voice of god, the dictate of Iao the milk of the dragon the idol of god is the dioty the institution and the state religion the perfect restaint the opium and rumination of the cattle of ra it is objective morality that wich is given from thow shalt not earned from thow wilt , this is the force that suplants the individual artistry of the soul,all that instructs the individualon how to live rather than living for them self this is the final suicide of the soul to the great toohey molech.
all that is imovable or describeable in the image of god ie truth is only the syntax the thelktikos or becoming and the becoming is the virtuous knowable god the rock in the torent of spring.
what for all aeons has instructed man the nature of god ie truth is unfathomable is the enimy of all wisdom.
it is he who walks upright who comprehends, who is he ez-ozel first to walk upright amoung the humans, the death of christ is inflicted at the cost leviathan,
what it is for the ego to resist socioty. the individual paying the cost of the herd
the comunity of christianity is the crusifixtion of there own messiha.
(((((by worshiping the instroment of his exicution they make an Idol out of death. )))))the tree of knowledge and pandoras box. the sorce from witch all evil entered the world, the aeon of religion and the church. it is from the ignorance of the leviathan that all that is “ pegan” the remaining tribes and aeons of god comprising the “monument of humanity”(the monument of the human spirit) has been kept apart and seperate , kept from reaching its fruition. a united family of god ie the soul what i should also call the human god that wich created the soul, a master of self. for it was humanity that bore divinity and created god when it dicovered it’s self ,( the self )
this blindness to the so called gentiles is why christ went first to the lost children of israel to awaken them from this elitism that judah and levi were the only children of god this prejudice and let us not mince words hatred is exactly who the son of man was sent down for . this is the great sleep of ignorance that christ came to wake the world from and yet as soon as he left it began again in the form of the roman church
hear we stand israel and islam the two brothers at war have we not had enough war would you please accept my invitation to peace and realize we are all gods children one family a global community of individuals called to the responsibility of freedom !
( what does el-shadai mean but god of the wilderness , and the pegan, country dweller.both pan and azazel ( ez-ozel ) are embodiments of christ one risen one fallen , one one tends to herds one turns sheep to sheaperds one rules the world the other teaches the world to rule its self. ( the anarchist and the king )
pan is the imitator of ez ozel he is the one who persued the nimph of syrinx into the reeds and made the flute of syrinx, pan is the form of the goat that tempted christ in the desert , pan is the devil christ is the ezozel they are two images of the same being the first and last man, fall and redemption , the last man sets free the first. it is pan who is the dioty of the temples of syrinx the demon ravana who persues sita.
( the bride of rama / the bride of christ)
for what reason do i supose the sacrifice of the lamb had be made ? that a stand agianst sacrifice must be made a sacrifice against all sacrifice a individual must stand agianst the world of idols , idols of rule , namely the law. christ was the first amoralist hidden before Zarathustura . it is the manipulation of the church that has told history otherwise. the fullfilment of the law is subjective law ie identity the apriori of the soul is crafted by the individual and so its expression the causal relationship of a postiori and creation that which emerges from the thelktikos.
i have said before god is a conjecture , what does that mean? god is im perfect god the god of heaven is only half of existance , so too is the god who created this god that of earth that of void , what do we aim for now not nearly los or dionycus but eos zurvan I say the marrage of light and dark. the eturnity of soul / sol ( time ) ( imust admit confusssion hear the void seems to me to be the only eturnal thing even time has a begining and a end / still i feel there is more to this argument. being is ontos / neumanon . matter is earth ( nothingness) sol / time is the marrage of the two the permanent inpermanent what is eturnal that goes under what forgets to remember.
ego death and rebirth. this is the rebirth of the messiha the merger of the sun and moon the ballencing of the black and golden sons the ballence of the force.
THE PILLAR OF DJED THE IDOL OF GOD, the rock and the sculpture, the obviscation and the art, I e.” truth” ( what was hidden in the father is reveled in the son the creator is his creation , our Bering soul is who and what we are.) what we “are” being” the monad the hidden god the tree of life. its anathema and reveler the essence of its ego—“Alethea”
THE ROCK AND SCULPTURE ,, MYTH AND MEANING..
through out the history of religion there has be a obviscation of “emmea”
( art- meaning) there has been made an object of derivation of the rock and surface and not its metaphore the art , by this parabol I present the idol of god, that the myth has been made paramount over meaning , it is the same warning of the powers vs the wisdom “ do not seek the powers” and the same metaphore of she who “is buying the stairway to heaven” and the same meaning nietzche spoke of the christian who “confuses the effect with the cause” exturnalizing the ego onto thier enviernment and god onto the exturnal world this is the exact same error made by lucifer and the law of the tower of babel the externalized merkabah of mars. the yoke of the religious places god in heaven rather than the human heart.
it is from the transposition of myth and meaning that the ego and “other”( i refer to “WHAT IS BLOWN OUT”) have achieved there inverssion and out of this perfect restriant that the herd was born, the morality of the devil is not egoism only that he is exalted he is a headless beast and a subtle plague the great dragon is the I am worship me Anu the god of religion and the old testiment. the beast of the abyss is his protoche and the beast of the earth the harvester of his flock. ( what is the greatest transposition of value, but the “I am worship I” to the”I am worship me”. from acountability of the self to the lambasting of a lamb a animal child , is this the virtue of inocence or self overcoming . let me say this hear and say it clearly what happened at calvery was an atrocity. that was done as an example that it should never occure agian ! when we sacerifice our acountability we sacrifice our souls like children to the great molech. the time has passed to behave like sheep , now is the epoch of the will to behave as macht as the will to power as a will to self overcoming to be a lion a being of thow willt not thou shalt.
the sacrifice of the azazel is the rebel against the rabble, the cost of what an individual takes to confront the herd.
how many times does the son of man have to be slaughtered among men untill the tree of knowledge is fulfilled
and from it grow a tree of life for this is the fullfillment of the law lawlessness, the monad is without condition it is agape love has no judgment. the divine judge judges none.
TO THE IDOL OF GOD..
A being that always desires worship has no self esteem, nor can it claim individual existence for it is not self sufficient.
( the affect / view, of the demiurge is a systemic flaw of the teachings of Anu )
he is not an object to be bowed prostraited and graveld upon ( that is the idol of god) ,—
— it is a power to be found within !
the one whom this world prays god ! god ! is infact the devil, who is it that you think that is the god of this world…
fear of god comes when posits the object state as god, positing the self as the absolute subject, is not the subject god? what kind of nihilism is this
could this be our first fall from god in existential terms that we discover our self as creator —and master is this not up from eden, away from the animal , the teleological , the —obedient…
Goeth; from Faust—( the voice of Prometheus ):
here i sit forming men,
in my own image,
a race to be like me,
to suffer, to weep,
to delight and to rejoice,
and to defy you,
as I do.
Lio Liber…
it is my opinion that the reason thus far man has not found suficient evidence for the proof of god is he has sought this in the external world and not within as god is the very soul and this is subjective man by implication must be his own god if he is to believe in one at all, otherwise he is postulating at an idol.
I qoute Yahweh at mnt. sianie : eheyeh asher eheyeh / I am I meaning: ego
it is my feeling we need to learn to see god as the soul its self , and not an object to prostrait and bow before, this is my concept of the defiance to the idol of god, and the old god seen as the gates of damnation.
That the world has been divided into two halves the spiritual and the carnal.
I find this and oversimplification of terms that there are three levels the body spirit and mind that some have felt the upper is both spirit and mind rather see it as a delineation that is spiritual and why the ego is soular both spiritual and carnal. This has been the premise of Eotism, and the namesake of the Cygnus dawn.
the idol of god has said the posssesion of identity is an atack on him in opposition to his heart, he speaks that the ego has assingened atributes to god that are the egos, while the ego takes on the atributes of god, may we more siimply say we are making our self god and taking acoutability for our selves as we create the race of gods ,
it is the ego that was is and always shall be the monad the “ I “ and “one”. It is the ilusivity and pluallity of oneness that are caracturistic of collectivism the great we.
hear me I call him out ! he is the great leviathan I am worship me, the state.
RELATIONSHIP TO ISLAM…
i quote Muhommet in the hadeth:
man is my mystery and i am his mystery, for i am he himself and he is i myself.
lio liber :
should it not be clear now stated , man , is the divine a trinity an ego a shadow and a fulcrum , a big angel and a little angel , and between man the sapient and most wise.
Azlan :
the essence and mystery of the pentical, man the tetragrammaton god in human form..
first let us example the great shema of the hebrews “hear of israel the lord our god is one”
what says mica the lion, slayer of all dragons is not the maening of this riddle the one is the I and the human- the divine,
jesus was god, and the herald of a new kind of god, one that does not require worship , one with reverence for himself. all mankind hath inhereted this curse of conciousness this adversity to rebel against nature to become a creator. not a beast.
and so i find great contradiction in the quran when it says christ was not god rather i say he was the first of his kind ( protogonas )and that he invited humanity to join him in this, rather i praise mohomet in one thing that christ was not meant to be worshiped and that this was an idolization of the god within, to which it is our responsibility to serve the fulcrum, wisdom. no longer maggot nor angel, we are but human and furthermore god , man the mortal god !
what was the crux of dyonicus’s rebellion from apollo and christianity ,, why should someone wait until they are dead to experience life…
could it be our serch for compleation that causes suffering and hell , constantly grasping for what is not there nothingness…perpetualy wanting for what canot be, could this be seperation from truth , perhaps all that is needed for emancipation from suffering is an honest apraisal of reality ie life.
with this freedom truly she must be wed to acountability, in exchange for power the byproduct of power is happyness the exuding of creation . hear is the art of the gift giving virtue to give selfishly with favor this being the soul the atribute of a god
a dialectic :
1. first it was said , thoughs who live for this life do you not see you are destroying your souls,
2. then it was understood to realize , carpe dium ( sieze the day) eat the marrow of life.
3. now let it be understood, that a personliving in self interest may live with intencion to leave somthing behind, a legacy of a better tomarow. and so be imortalized by this memory could this not be the monument of the diotelos , the marrage of apollo and dionysus. the cynus dawn.
THE GOD-MAN = IDOL OF GOD… and the Man who is god..
alas you have shattered the beautiful world, with brazen fist it falls it is scattered. by a demigod destroyed. we are trailing its ruins into the void, and wailing over a beauty undone, and ended. earths mighty son, more splendid rebuilt it, you therefore who are strong build again within ! and begin a new life, a new way, lucid , gay, and play new songs…
no longer a god who is called upon , but he who we become, this new doctrine , truly god is not with us, he is in us.
some have said to me god sent the god-man to hide our ignorance and save us from accountability, that to me is at-least how it sounds the god-man is not i am he in his self is of course but this must be attained subjectively , the ideal of worshiping such an object outside of the self is simply idolatry and this inits highest form . it to robs man of his only truly god given right accountability and this the means of freedom , or salvation if you will but this god-mans greatest error perhaps was that he did not say save your self as this as it is , is god.
what i mean to illustrate here is not that it is unvirtuos to die for your values or sacrifice for your love ,, but that jesus did not demand worship of himself but of the spirit within , and that this divine flame is what we should hold reverence for.
what i speak of heare is hard to reason with for most people though to me is is as sound as a diamond , it is frieghtening for peple to comprehend ownership over themselves to this degree , it is a leap of acountability, that theatens all familiarity and faith , and truly should be known as faithless. for it tampers with the real. and rattles its bones to the core. there is a fourthrightness in this introspection , that may leave many running throught the night, with the homes in flames.,
yet some will tend there lanturns, and prepair for new dawns..
EDEN THE FRUIT AND THE IDOL… what shall we call it this logos, non and null..
I quote Sartre :
my original fall is the existence of the other”, it is before the other i am guilty , first when beneath the others look, i experience my alienation and it’s nakedness as a fall from grace , which i must assume from this quote taken from scripture: “they knew they where naked”
thus the for its self which is wholly subjectivity feels its self to be guilty because it is made an object by another.
we can not live without making objects and means of the other, thus transcending his transcendence, and this is to do violence, to his subjectivity. fear before god, says Sartre, comes when one tries to glorify this object state by positing oneself as only an object before and absolute subject. — what i here refer to as the mayabraman, “or Idol of god”
what is the mayabrahman but dominion over others and the “being for its self” (master of self) but dominion over self.
THE NEW CONTRACT WITH THE DIVINE, The covenant of Michael.
they have said “I have not gods not even they of womon but women is my god the nature of the hetrotrodox, i am self aserted, i quote her sonet, the thunder of my heart, “I have no god but great is my god!”
I want to die, never will I be forgiven until I am dead, to choose to celebrate life and never know it’s nectar, and yet I speak these words..
I speak of my own accord no oath of mine could ever be spoken in any other manner, and yet I speak it for the love of my wife. I am the suitor of truth..
the heterodox and all things established by the self.
So long has humanity lived in foreign lands unfaithful to the heart. He has saught to edify deities, the priests the kings, offering up his own children in offerings to the dragon of yor, he had spoke god, but truly what was meant but idol and idol of god, as he had worshipped the mask of satanael a demiurge created by the devil. For the devil sought to free mankind by destroying him and god to preserve by enslavement. But Even before Anu the dragon of heaven had man not known himself. A god within worthy of dying for while walking the tightrope of life. To live for oneself is noble, but I live to die for my wife, is not wisdom the practice of death and I no man’s hero.
Yet what may I say to you I bare some mandates; that you yourself may find to be true if you find truth in what I say for only the individual man himself may define his own morals and truly his own truth …
let us continue, from the dawn of history from the cradle of our civilization man had worshipped gods, weather as one god or many or as one as the head of a pantheon, he had placed divinity outside the realm of his own comprehension and ethics as-well, under these gods lay kings under these kings lay priests and under they the masses, all obeyed this hierarchy of subjugation.. and the ethics as were handed down with.. in the time of summer Anu, in the time of Abraham El shadai.. in Jesu the mystery of the heart was revealed but man still did not have a mind of his own but were sheep..so was the lamb of the father.. for I and I were one and so it was spoke as yet man could not speak of his own accord none had beef brave enough, so now I speaketh! So speaks the lion in the name of my self I make these gestures in the name of reason I herald this wisdom. That the heart must be ruled by the mind and the mind is the savior of the heart… such was the fire of heaven Jesus spoke of … but the earth the moon and pleadies of these things most I seek… the chalice of Joseph and the redemption of the world that the world is not waste it was in making waste of life we found it this way, that the truth in not in the stars but planted firmly in our hearts, the monad the self the ego and I and if one had known it’s mystery they had known it is a woman and not have been to haughty to listen… and if one had only heard they would know it is the world that is insane and the lunatic that adorated the sun.
What was spoken at Eden the sun of Sinai restore to him the father of heaven the wayward son, that the first liberator of man may be the last. In such way may emerge the family of EL.
What I am saying in short is simple, the priests the kings the gods defy them all, they are the perfect trinity of tyranny, they have obviscated the god within and more the goddess wisdom.
To my mother my father the gods I know you are all there you watch over us you surround us all it greaves my heart there is such war between us. that is my namesake the prince of peace, to end this war. that my war is a spiritual one to bring peace to this world though to the world they are confounded and see nothing of the sort.
a disclaimer to the false heralds / prophets …
for the record all the disinformation of channelers and priests who claim esclusive authority to this thing they call “ prime creator” that god has spoken to them alone or that it can only come under there authority , i say this god speakes to all of us he is our very soul there is no “ prime creator” there is only the creator the force from within the individual that creates it is the acountability of our actions in the world that create the mirror to the soul to allow knowledge of this meaning of life it is simple self knowledge is the meaning and knowledge of god .
so speaks the helel zarathustura invites you take acountability look within know yourself and know you are god and thus become a god
knowledge of self is knowledge of god !
that there is no god only gods, that this one and imperishable god is the self , heart and human soul, this teaching of Mosus (Osiris ) on sinai Eheyeh Asher Eheyeh…
( Ego )
ego is self, wisdom is self awere, the observer, observing and awere of the self, the hammer and sculpter of the soul, the da-sien self awereness. as a thinking being one with free will and soul is self awere if god is free will its self he is self-awere only a fool says there is no god …chaos begets conciousness from conciousness comes the world as free will exists as self awereness there must be inand of its self a greater conciousness called god , but too with out exception the individual represensnts and is acountable to this god it is spirit it is self ( ego )
i would like to submit one final argument to this thesis eikasea or imagination may infact be the most primordial form of all knowedge and the root of things, and the tail of noesis that the head of the serpent bites, an eternal ring, of the wisdom of things mankind has forgot in this modern age, that even our beliefs and insights bare not fruit without this wisdom. and this rebellious and forbiden wisdom the gate of the soul. ego itself the ring of Rahab…
I have no god, many are my gods…
I have no god, great is my god…
Excerpt from thunder perfect mind Nag hammadi… in this lies the confusion of the Abrahamic god , as an archetype nomenal and eternal as real and subjective plural
Of the history of man there have been idols and the idol of god, I propose I new idol, the idol of the soul… that man should be an artist of himself, and bid it adoration…