top of page

Deep ecology and the global holon of economic theory:

 

What had not been understood by the west nor east I now express, there is a term in systems theory called “Santiago’s theory of cognition” and it underscores all shortcomings on both sides of the coin, as to dialectical nominism , it invokes a name word excetra ( in a noemanal and aswell unfolded sense to the western ear and eye it reeks of Globalism which to brings contempt yet understanding this simple paradigm may alow it to act as a key to the marriage of polarities entrenched in this delema…

 

In consciousness resurch there too is another word that stands in symbiosis to this concept “the houndreth monkey concept” that is consciousness is a network as all life once this is asserted we may see how this applies to economy and the living system of trade on a global level… to I feel this will influence our stature towards justice, ethics, and metaphysics but for now we will begin with the dollar even as it is soon to demise.

 

TO ADDRESS THE HUMAN STEWARD OF THE DEEP PARADIGM :

 

if she ever leaves me i will not live for a instant longer. Who is she ! My ego, the shakti which identifies with my body…

 

—Aghora 1 at the left hand of god

 

shallow ecology is anthropocentric, human centered, thus consiquencialy veiws human afaires outside of nature, and the source of all value, and looks to nature as only a use of human value

 

i quote the fountain head : “i love the earth not for what it is but what i can make of it” 

 

deep ecology does  not seperate man nor any other constituent of nature from the whole. but sees it all as a web or network of of phenomina intrinsicaly enweaved upon the web of life.

 

to quote “the web of life” by frujof capra : untimately deep ecolical awerenessis spiritual or religious awereness. when the human spirit is understood as the mode of consciousness in which the individual feels a sence of belonging, of conectiveness, to the cosmos as a whole.

 

as i have stated in the opening passage of this ideal is that it is the individual human steward that must be lord over this new paradigm but this lord has reached a turning point in his reason and found the only thing that made him creative was the earth, the very humas of the human, the earth of which we all have been born.

 

the westurn  ideal of capitalism of an open market obaying the laws of nature ie survival of the fittest has proved to be a misnomer our race is destroying itself, and what if the next fittest creature is realy more the likes of a cockroach ? nietzsche thought so when he spoke of the last man and the superman. 

 

what i speak is the religion of man that honors woman… the mother of all…

 

 

Deep paradigm:

 

My disagreement with this paradigm is simple and lies as such:

 man is not an animal nor a plant nor simply a rock but is placed above them all by the faculty of reason and individuality for this reason he is not apart from nature but invariably above it is and though not following in its suit obligated to watch over and be its steward knowing one thing it is the ground on which he stands. and if he fails at this so does all the civilization he has erected by its hearth. 

 

We must learn to see this earth as our mother, a thing to place above all things but by selling our souls if this we find our way to go we will throw the baby out with the bath water and go the way of molech.

 

 

In defense of the deep paradigm:

 

Ecology comes from the Greek word oikos and means household just as when a being is removed from a human household, that is a family member is removed there is a tremendous hole in that home. So to in nature to use the words of A.G. Tansley the ecosystem or as he put superorganism is missing a part a member and and ingredient to its survival.. the damage we are doing to complex ecosystem’s cannot cannot be undone by simply planting more trees or placing moratoriums on commercial fishing.. we are irrepreabley destroying ecosystems that are just as much members of the collective status of our planet us included should we not abate this behavior it would be worse than loosing a limb we may part ways with a prescious organ of our body that could heal us from some future illness.

 

Community or the concept of and interconnected network is as essential to the modern philosopher as the notion of fate. A thing we would all deny but it is an intrenchment in our accountability to the world that brings us to this term and is we do not understand how we impact our environment we may never have power over our own as our place in the world may have ceased. And with the world for we have been the only species on this planet native to it thus far with the capacity to destroy our world and if we do not understand the consequences of our actions we will destroy ourselves aswell.

 

to address certain colficts between conflicting ideologies

 

What baffles me most about the ecological delema is that only communists seem to care for the well being of our environment…those most in guilt of the role of the lamprey, and parasite.. rather the problem with the far right is they want a quick fix.. and ignore the long term consequences of their actions. A middle ground must be reached were east and west convene and this I have called tightrope economics. As an economic system is a foreshadowing of an ecological consequence so starting from this foundation I feel the rest may fall into place. 

 

I had spoken of my metaphysics and no one listened here is my solution to the dollar.

bottom of page